What role should legal counsel play before a company deploys a customer facing ai tool

Reviewing Potential Liability Exposure From Incorrect Output

Legal counsel should review the potential liability exposure a customer-facing AI tool could create if it provides incorrect or harmful information a customer might reasonably rely on, since courts have in various documented cases held businesses responsible for commitments or statements their own AI chatbot made to customers.

Ensuring Terms of Service Adequately Address AI-Specific Risk

Legal counsel should also ensure the business’s terms of service and any specific disclosure language adequately address AI-specific risks, including appropriate disclaimers about the tool’s limitations and clear language addressing what happens if the AI tool provides information that turns out to be inaccurate or otherwise problematic.

Confirming Data Handling Compliance With Relevant Privacy Regulations

Beyond liability and disclosure considerations, legal counsel should confirm the specific AI tool’s data handling practices comply with relevant privacy regulations applicable to the business’s operating jurisdictions and customer base, since a customer-facing AI tool typically processes customer data in ways that need to align with existing privacy compliance obligations.

Why This Legal Review Represents a Genuinely Important Pre-Deployment Checkpoint

This legal review provides a genuinely important compliance checkpoint before a business commits to putting an AI tool directly in front of customers, helping identify and address potential legal exposure proactively rather than discovering these issues only after a problem has already occurred and potentially caused real customer harm or legal consequences.

Why This Review Should Continue Even After Initial Deployment

Given that AI tools and their capabilities can change over time, and relevant regulations continue evolving, this legal review shouldn’t be treated as a single pre-launch checkpoint alone, but rather as an ongoing practice revisited periodically to ensure continued compliance as both the tool and the surrounding regulatory landscape develop further.

Bottom Line

Legal counsel should review a customer-facing AI tool’s potential liability exposure, ensure terms of service adequately address AI-specific risks, and confirm data handling compliance before deployment, providing an important compliance checkpoint that should continue periodically even after the tool has already launched.

Estimate Your Time Savings

See how many hours and dollars using AI for a repeated task could save you with our free AI Time-Savings Calculator.

Go deeper

• How Does AI Help In-House Counsel Keep Up With Changing Regulations?
• What legal structures do ai startups use to limit liability from model outputs?
• What Are the Risks of Relying on AI for Compliance Monitoring?