Is It Illegal to Create a Deepfake of Someone Without Consent?

No Single Federal Answer — It’s Jurisdiction- and Context-Dependent

Whether creating a non-consensual deepfake of someone is illegal doesn’t have one simple yes-or-no answer in the United States, because there is no single comprehensive federal statute that criminalizes all non-consensual deepfakes across every possible context. Instead, the legal landscape is a patchwork: some specific categories of deepfake content are addressed by targeted federal or state laws, others fall under existing legal doctrines not written specifically with deepfakes in mind, and some situations may not be clearly covered by any current law, an active and evolving gap that lawmakers continue to debate.

This means the honest answer to “is it illegal” genuinely depends on what kind of deepfake, in what context, and in which state or country.

Where the Clearest Legal Protections Exist

The most developed area of deepfake-specific law in the U.S. involves non-consensual intimate imagery. A number of states have passed laws specifically criminalizing the creation or distribution of sexually explicit deepfake content depicting a real person without their consent, recognizing the severe harm this category of content causes. Separately, a number of states have also passed laws targeting deepfakes used in political and election contexts, driven by concerns about AI-generated disinformation influencing voters, often requiring disclosure or restricting certain uses close to an election.

Federal legislation addressing non-consensual deepfakes, particularly intimate imagery, has been introduced and debated in Congress, reflecting recognition that a national approach may be needed given how content can cross state lines instantly online, though the specific federal legal landscape continues to develop.

When Existing, Non-Deepfake-Specific Law Still Applies

Even in situations or jurisdictions without a law written specifically for deepfakes, other existing legal doctrines can potentially apply depending on the facts. Defamation law can apply if a deepfake falsely depicts someone in a way that damages their reputation. Harassment and stalking laws can apply depending on how the content is used against a specific individual. Right-of-publicity law, which protects against unauthorized commercial use of someone’s likeness, may apply in certain deepfake contexts as well. Fraud law can apply if a deepfake is used to deceive someone for financial gain, such as in scams using cloned voices or faces.

Bottom Line

There is no single federal law making all non-consensual deepfakes illegal in the U.S., but a growing number of states have enacted laws targeting specific harmful categories like non-consensual intimate imagery and election-related deepfakes, and existing defamation, harassment, and fraud law can also apply depending on the situation — making this an area where the specific facts and jurisdiction genuinely determine the legal outcome.

Go deeper

• What laws currently govern how the US federal government can use AI?
• Are There Laws Specifically Regulating AI Use in Political Campaigns?
• What laws currently regulate AI use in hiring decisions?