AI Security & Cyber Threats · AI Cybersecurity Risks & Workforce
How do security teams evaluate a new ai tool before deploying it internally
Security teams evaluate a new AI tool before internal deployment by reviewing the vendor's data handling and retention practices, testing the tool for known vulnerability classes like prompt injection susceptibility, and assessing what level of access the tool would need to existing company systems, treating this review as comparable in rigor to evaluating any other new software vendor.
Key takeaways
- Security teams review a vendor's data handling and retention practices before approving a new AI tool.
- Testing for known vulnerability classes like prompt injection susceptibility is a standard part of this review.
- Assessing what system access level the tool would require is a critical part of the evaluation.
- This review process is generally treated as comparable in rigor to any other new software vendor evaluation.
Reviewing Vendor Data Handling and Retention Practices
Security teams generally begin by reviewing a prospective AI tool vendor’s data handling and retention practices in detail, understanding exactly what data the tool collects, how long it’s retained, whether it’s used to train the vendor’s broader models, and what contractual protections exist around this data handling.
Testing for Known AI-Specific Vulnerability Classes
Beyond general data practices, security teams increasingly test new AI tools for susceptibility to known AI-specific vulnerability classes, particularly prompt injection, attempting to determine whether the tool can be manipulated into revealing information or taking actions it shouldn’t through carefully crafted adversarial input.
Assessing Required System Access Levels
A critical part of this evaluation involves assessing exactly what level of access the tool would need to existing company systems and data to function as intended, since a tool requiring broad, deep system access represents meaningfully greater security exposure than one operating with more narrowly scoped, limited access.
Why This Process Mirrors Traditional Vendor Security Review
This overall evaluation process generally mirrors the rigor security teams already apply to evaluating any other new software vendor, extending established vendor risk assessment practices to cover the additional, genuinely novel risk categories AI tools specifically introduce beyond what traditional software vendor evaluation typically covers.
Why Many Teams Apply Additional Scrutiny Specifically for AI Tools
Given these genuinely novel risk categories — data potentially feeding into model training, and vulnerability to attack techniques like prompt injection without a direct traditional-software equivalent — many security teams apply additional scrutiny specifically for AI tools beyond their standard vendor evaluation process.
Bottom Line
Security teams evaluate new AI tools by reviewing vendor data handling practices, testing for AI-specific vulnerabilities like prompt injection susceptibility, and assessing required system access levels, generally extending established vendor security review rigor to cover AI’s genuinely novel additional risk categories.
Go deeper
Frequently asked questions
Do AI tools get evaluated more strictly than typical software vendors?
Many security teams do apply additional scrutiny specifically for AI tools, given genuinely novel risk categories like prompt injection and data used for model training that don't have a direct equivalent in traditional software vendor evaluation.
Related questions
- What skills do cybersecurity professionals need as AI becomes more central to the field?
- Can AI systems themselves be hacked and what does that actually look like?
- Are AI coding assistants introducing new security vulnerabilities into software?
- Why is patching an ai model harder than patching traditional software?
- Can ai be used to automatically generate working exploit code?
- What is data exfiltration risk in ai connected browser agents?
Sources
- [1]Cybersecurity guidance — Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- [2]AI security research — National Institute of Standards and Technology
Written by Editorial Team
Last updated August 2, 2026
Get one well-sourced answer a week
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.